This month issue of IRW will soon be out. Because I was focused on it I was not able to follow the discussion on SEO quackery.

I am now publishing a full response to Rand and Ben demanding a public retraction from both for putting out SEO quackery. SEO quack “science” is worse than mere SEO myths because involves using scientific concepts in a convoluted way.  I guess I would need to open a new category called in that way.

You can see my responses at the following links:

http://irthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/04/23/beware-of-seo-statistical-studies/

http://irthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/on-spearmans-correlation-coefficients-with-excel/

About these ads